EXPOSED: 600 Terrorists Entered U.S. Under Biden's Watch, Gabbard Reveals

Paul Riverbank, 5/1/2025Report reveals 600 terrorists entered US, raising alarm over border security under Biden administration.

Border Security Crisis Reveals Troubling Oversight Failures

The numbers are startling, even to seasoned observers of American border policy. I've spent decades covering immigration issues, but the latest revelations about our border security deserve more than just passing attention.

Let me paint you a picture: Back in 2020, border agents might encounter one or two people on terror watchlists in a typical month. Fast forward to today, and we're looking at hundreds. This isn't just a statistical blip – it represents a fundamental shift in who's crossing our borders and why.

During a particularly tense Cabinet meeting last week, DNI Tulsi Gabbard dropped what can only be described as a bombshell. Roughly 600 individuals with terrorist connections somehow slipped through our vetting process and received parole. Think about that for a moment. We're not talking about simple paperwork errors here – these are people with verified links to terrorist organizations.

But here's where it gets even more concerning. Beyond the terrorism angle, we're seeing a surge in connections to groups that have plagued Latin America for years. The intelligence community has identified 700 individuals tied to organizations like MS-13 and the Sinaloa cartel. I remember covering MS-13's rise in the early 2000s – their presence in this current wave of border crossings signals something more organized than desperate migration.

The strain on our border personnel is reaching a breaking point. Just ask DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, who told me the other day that assaults on law enforcement have jumped 300%. "These cartels are getting increasingly desperate," she said, her voice carrying the weight of someone who's seen the situation deteriorate firsthand.

The raw numbers tell their own story. Consider this: from 2017 to 2020, border agents encountered 14 people on terror watch lists. Since 2021? That number exploded to 385. And it's not just about numbers – it's about who's coming. Recent House Judiciary Committee findings show surprising spikes in arrivals from countries that raise red flags: 2,134 Afghan nationals, 33,347 Chinese nationals, and hundreds from Iran, Syria, and Uzbekistan.

I've watched administrations of both parties grapple with border security, but this situation feels different. McLaughlin's "all hands on deck" approach, involving everyone from DHS to the Pentagon, suggests an urgency I haven't seen before.

The implications here go beyond politics. When federal agencies scramble to track down individuals who entered during previous policy windows, it raises uncomfortable questions about our vetting procedures. DNI Gabbard's office is now working overtime with the Attorney General and NCTC, while the DEA joins the fight against newly designated terrorist organizations at the border.

Looking ahead, the challenge isn't just about stopping new threats – it's about addressing the consequences of past decisions. As someone who's watched this issue evolve over decades, I can say with certainty: this isn't your typical immigration debate anymore. This is about fundamental national security, and the choices we make now will echo for years to come.

Border Security Crisis Reveals Troubling Oversight FailuresThe numbers are startling, even to seasoned observers of American border policy. I've spent decades covering immigration issues, but the latest revelations about our border security deserve more than just passing attention.Let me paint you a picture: Back in 2020, border agents might encounter one or two people on terror watchlists in a typical month. Fast forward to today, and we're looking at hundreds. This isn't just a statistical blip – it represents a fundamental shift in who's crossing our borders and why.During a particularly tense Cabinet meeting last week, DNI Tulsi Gabbard dropped what can only be described as a bombshell. Roughly 600 individuals with terrorist connections somehow slipped through our vetting process and received parole. Think about that for a moment. We're not talking about simple paperwork errors here – these are people with verified links to terrorist organizations.But here's where it gets even more concerning. Beyond the terrorism angle, we're seeing a surge in connections to groups that have plagued Latin America for years. The intelligence community has identified 700 individuals tied to organizations like MS-13 and the Sinaloa cartel. I remember covering MS-13's rise in the early 2000s – their presence in this current wave of border crossings signals something more organized than desperate migration.The strain on our border personnel is reaching a breaking point. Just ask DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, who told me the other day that assaults on law enforcement have jumped 300%. "These cartels are getting increasingly desperate," she said, her voice carrying the weight of someone who's seen the situation deteriorate firsthand.The raw numbers tell their own story. Consider this: from 2017 to 2020, border agents encountered 14 people on terror watch lists. Since 2021? That number exploded to 385. And it's not just about numbers – it's about who's coming. Recent House Judiciary Committee findings show surprising spikes in arrivals from countries that raise red flags: 2,134 Afghan nationals, 33,347 Chinese nationals, and hundreds from Iran, Syria, and Uzbekistan.I've watched administrations of both parties grapple with border security, but this situation feels different. McLaughlin's "all hands on deck" approach, involving everyone from DHS to the Pentagon, suggests an urgency I haven't seen before.The implications here go beyond politics. When federal agencies scramble to track down individuals who entered during previous policy windows, it raises uncomfortable questions about our vetting procedures. DNI Gabbard's office is now working overtime with the Attorney General and NCTC, while the DEA joins the fight against newly designated terrorist organizations at the border.Looking ahead, the challenge isn't just about stopping new threats – it's about addressing the consequences of past decisions. As someone who's watched this issue evolve over decades, I can say with certainty: this isn't your typical immigration debate anymore. This is about fundamental national security, and the choices we make now will echo for years to come.