ANTIFA-Linked Military Expert Arrested Over Trump Assassination Threats

Paul Riverbank, 6/17/2025Former Coast Guard officer arrested for making detailed assassination threats against Trump using military expertise.

The arrest of Peter Stinson, a decorated former Coast Guard lieutenant, marks a disturbing intersection of military expertise and political threats in our increasingly volatile political landscape.

I've spent the past day examining the court documents, and what emerges is far more complex than typical social media vitriol. Stinson's alleged threats against former President Trump reveal a troubling pattern that security experts have long warned about – the potential danger posed by individuals with specialized military training.

The details paint a sobering picture. Between 2020 and 2023, Stinson reportedly leveraged multiple social media platforms to issue what prosecutors describe as calculated threats. His military background – particularly his recognized sharpshooting abilities – adds a layer of credibility that security services couldn't ignore.

What caught my attention was the evolution of these threats. They began with relatively veiled references but grew more explicit over time. In one particularly concerning post from April 2020, Stinson allegedly discussed the use of "a rifle and a scope." By May, he had escalated to making references to Luigi Mangione, drawing parallels to another high-profile case.

Perhaps most revealing was Stinson's apparent self-awareness. Following a recent incident at Trump's Butler rally, he allegedly posted an almost clinical analysis of assassination attempts, noting that "execution is critical" and discussing the specialized skills required. This wasn't just angry rhetoric – it showed tactical consideration.

The investigation also revealed Stinson's repeated use of "8647," a code that gained notoriety after former FBI Director James Comey's controversial social media activity. This detail suggests a deeper engagement with anti-Trump messaging beyond mere emotional responses.

His alleged connection to ANTIFA adds another dimension to this case. "Sure. This is war," he reportedly posted on February 2. "Sides will be drawn. Antifa always wins in the end." Such statements reflect a broader pattern of political polarization that continues to challenge our democratic discourse.

As Stinson heads to federal court Wednesday, this case raises crucial questions about the intersection of military expertise, political extremism, and social media. It's a stark reminder that in our digital age, threats to political figures require increasingly sophisticated assessment and response.

Looking ahead, law enforcement agencies face a complex challenge: how to effectively monitor online threats while respecting civil liberties, particularly when dealing with individuals whose military training demands elevated concern. The outcome of this case may well influence future approaches to political security in our increasingly connected world.

The arrest of Peter Stinson, a decorated former Coast Guard lieutenant, marks a disturbing intersection of military expertise and political threats in our increasingly volatile political landscape.I've spent the past day examining the court documents, and what emerges is far more complex than typical social media vitriol. Stinson's alleged threats against former President Trump reveal a troubling pattern that security experts have long warned about – the potential danger posed by individuals with specialized military training.The details paint a sobering picture. Between 2020 and 2023, Stinson reportedly leveraged multiple social media platforms to issue what prosecutors describe as calculated threats. His military background – particularly his recognized sharpshooting abilities – adds a layer of credibility that security services couldn't ignore.What caught my attention was the evolution of these threats. They began with relatively veiled references but grew more explicit over time. In one particularly concerning post from April 2020, Stinson allegedly discussed the use of "a rifle and a scope." By May, he had escalated to making references to Luigi Mangione, drawing parallels to another high-profile case.Perhaps most revealing was Stinson's apparent self-awareness. Following a recent incident at Trump's Butler rally, he allegedly posted an almost clinical analysis of assassination attempts, noting that "execution is critical" and discussing the specialized skills required. This wasn't just angry rhetoric – it showed tactical consideration.The investigation also revealed Stinson's repeated use of "8647," a code that gained notoriety after former FBI Director James Comey's controversial social media activity. This detail suggests a deeper engagement with anti-Trump messaging beyond mere emotional responses.His alleged connection to ANTIFA adds another dimension to this case. "Sure. This is war," he reportedly posted on February 2. "Sides will be drawn. Antifa always wins in the end." Such statements reflect a broader pattern of political polarization that continues to challenge our democratic discourse.As Stinson heads to federal court Wednesday, this case raises crucial questions about the intersection of military expertise, political extremism, and social media. It's a stark reminder that in our digital age, threats to political figures require increasingly sophisticated assessment and response.Looking ahead, law enforcement agencies face a complex challenge: how to effectively monitor online threats while respecting civil liberties, particularly when dealing with individuals whose military training demands elevated concern. The outcome of this case may well influence future approaches to political security in our increasingly connected world.